>>3561620Nobody said "you must buy x brand, not y brand", people are giving their honest reviews of using these cameras. Sony is piss scared of that which is why people like you fall back on "S-Sony make the sensors for other cameras so that makes them superior". There's more to a camera than cramming in technology and buffing up the spec sheet with tick marks. You can tell Sony make cameras for specfags/gearfags and some of the competition make cameras for photographers made by photographers. That's why Sonyggers have the bad reputation of owning a Sony cameras but never taking any photos with them. A reputation that this board often proves to be true.
>>3561623I can tell you're low IQ because you go direct to Amazon as if they're the arbiters of pricing for all retailers. I bet you don't even have a price history chart extension installed on your browser. Fujifilm sell refurb kits on their own site, often with the 18-55 included for free. And the used market shows the true value of these cameras, sort the X-T2 by completed auctions and it trends at £450-500 at the moment.
This was a deal a short while ago where the X-T2 was £600 new at a shitty brick and mortar retailer. This is the standard price for an X-T2 most of the year now.
And who cares if the Sony A6000 is cheaper? It's a shit camera and the people who buy it never seem to take any photos with it because it's so unpleasant to use. I know that's why I sold mine.
