>>4379159I am not one to shill sony but this is a retarded comparison. The half shuttered A7C has 6.5 more stops of DR than the ccrippled half shuttered R8 with its APSC point n shitter "battery" that dies before you can take a photo.
IBIS: +5 stops
Not a crippled sensor: +1 stop
Lens vignettes less than full faggot "pancake": +0.5 stops
The G9II has 10 more stops.
IBIS: +8
Sensor size: -1
Better sensor: +2
Lenses vignette less: +1
Protip: If you want small cameras, full frame is not it lmfao! You look like a fucking cuck with your "pancake" that vignettes 3 stops and focuses like a DSLR lens from 1988.
>but canon has 14 bit raws in mech shutter for extra DRThe G9II has 16 bit raws, and look, same as the R5II.
>>4379149I've come around on bill claff charts. ISO mis-definition aside. They are ALWAYS wrong about "dynamic range" BECAUSE PHOTON SHOT NOISE DOES NOT HAVE FUCKING DICK TO DO WITH DYNAMIC RANGE. The noise reduction doesnt add DR, its just about canon lying to you and reviewers so people won't point out that they are selling a $4500 APS-C camera. it has no reason to be full frame. NONE. If it were an APS-C camera it could have the same readout and the same DR, if not more (if panasonic made it). Canon is ASHAMED of their camera. PANASONIC IS PROUD! Hang your head in shame and COPE, canon cuck! It's not getting signal, only noise!
Only shadow recovery at full saturation measures dynamic range in raws. Dynamic range is about SENSOR TECH not SENSOR SIZE which is why there are APS-C cinema cameras with multiple stop advantages over fool frame and DX medium format. And ALLL canon mirrorless cameras stop recovering shadow detail and start recovering noise after +4. The Z7II, which has an actual full frame sensor, stops recovering detail and starts recovering noise after +5. There is no differeince in the r5ii's image besides more color fog between +4 and +5. NR hides missing DR.
>>4379189No. Dual gain sensors, better mounts (Z), 45mp, and no mirror slap.
