>>4110615>Hot takeMore like ambien take.
>Nobody cares about your identity until you do something to make people care about your identityThat cat has long been out of the bag.
>Film has an easily assignable monetary value per shot, but that's just a convolution from the actual value of a photograph, namely its content. If your photo is worth less because it was shot on digital (barring specialised film techniques that you can't really replicate with digital) then you're hiding behind convolutions to convince yourself that your photos might be more valuable than they actually are. You're coping, in other words. This isn't the reason why you're avoiding itIt's not just that it has monetary value, it's that I shoot less of it. For me to forego a film photo by posting it on /p/ is a bigger loss than posting some dime a dozen digital shot. Also I'd rather not post anything than post something like
>>4110404. It looks like the stuff I took testing a tele a while ago, pic related. Would you guys seriously have people post trash like this than not post anything?
