>>4261921>>Compromises by the Sony having 33% higher pixel countThrown away on lossy compression.
>>Compromises by having an AA filter when Sony doesn'tYet it's just as sharp as the A7iv, which means it's better (sharpness + moire resistance). Why can't Sony make useful AA filters?
>>Compromises on lens selection and pricing against sonyRF+EF is a larger catalog with more low price deals.
>inb4 adapter cryingCanon's adapters work perfectly, unlike Sony's.
>>Compromises on video bitrate against sonyR6ii records up to 340 Mbps internal, A7iv records up to 200 Mbps internal. Why do you feel the need to lie? R6ii also does RAW ext.
>>Compromises by having worse DR and shadow recovery than the Sonypicrel shows an even match. Why do you feel the need to lie?
>>Sony has infinite buffer at 10fps, canon at 12fps (slowest) doesn'tSony is using 12-bit with lossy compression at 10 fps, equal to the R6ii in JPEG which is infinite buffer. At 14-bit lossless RAW the Sony can ONLY shoot 6 fps. There's no comparing the two, the A7iv is a slow camera.
>>Sony 24-70 and 70-200 2.8 are cheaper than canon RF versionsThere are so many 24-70 and 70-200 choices for the R6ii that it's ridiculous.
>>Sony a7iv is cheaper than r6iiThey both list at $2,500 absent any sales or deals. Right now the R6ii is on sale cheaper ($2k vs. $2.2k). Why do you feel the need to lie?
