>>4073418>>4073419As I said OP, vitriolic trolls that are angry at the world.
Does the A7 have problems? sure, the autofocus sucks, but looking at your photos this really doesn't look like it would be of any concern. at $400 for a 2nd hand one in good condition from a store, the image quality and ability to adapt to vintage lenses without compromise is 2nd to none, it's super compact and the viewfinder is a joy to use.
The nonsense about "vignetting issues with e-mount" is absolute tinfoil hat territory and a perfectly valid reason to never listen to a word this person says. You can even prove his nonsense by taking his claim of "mount smaller than the sensor" and do the maths, diagonal of a ff sensor is 43mm (ff is 24x36mm in size), google the diameter of e-mount and it's over 46mm, not to mention it shows anons basic disregard for how optics work, the image flares out from a central point in the lens in a pyramidal fashion, even if the mount was smaller, it would be highly unlikely to interfere with the light path from the lens. pic attached shows how this works and why a mount diameter that's at least the size of the sensor diagonal could never interfere with the image.
And do be prepared, they will probably go off on another insane rant that can be disproven in half a sentence, these guys REALLY hate it when you buy into a system that they couldn't afford when they started.
