>>4369855Your only pieces of "evidence" are blog posts which you refuse to link to. You name drop people and scream SCIENCE! because you're incapable of posting your own comparisons (nocamera?), but no science is present.
- Henning Serger's comments aren't even in a blog post, they are in a god damn forum (LMFAO). A bunch of old men in a circlejerk while they tell each other how many lp/mm film captures but with ZERO EVIDENCE. Here's the blog post and the forum link. Funny that I will post them but you WILL NOT.
https://jpbuffington.com/?p=167https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/rollei-rpx-25-grain-and-resolution.115244/There is literally ZERO evidence in that forum discussion and blog. Nobody backed up their numbers with scans, microscope shots, anything. The only photos are on page 3 and they're shitty, soft, scratched, grainy snapshits. Just a bunch of boomers saying "hurr I got these numbers film rulz!" with zero evidence, zero experimentation, zero science. Grandpa told you he once catched a 100 ft long prehistoric and extinct fish but can't provide a photograph and you not only believe him you scream IT'S SCIENCE!!!
- I can't even find whatever you're attributing to Jim Kasson, and I'm sure you won't link it.
- The only thing I can find from Tim Parkin is from fucking 2009. Just like with Henning Serger there is ZERO EVIDENCE. No film scans, no microscope shots, nothing, nada. One shitty crop that's supposed to prove something about the color resolution of a fucking original Canon 5D. Besides that just a bunch of words where he repeats common myths and lp/mm claims backed by nothing.
http://www.timparkin.net/2009/12/colour-digital-vs-film-resolution/NOT ONE of your precious authors meet the standards of science. You have to perform a fucking experiment, one others can repeat, and provide evidence to meet the standards of science. Neither you nor your names have EVER done this. Your evidence amounts to shit posts on a forum.
