>>37449285/?
>>3744064crop or fix your blacks on the left side. you have way too many dead pixels
>>3744066first one is slightlyyyy better but i hate how theyre cropped in both. you should definitely edit out whatever is in the bottom left corner of the second photo. and fix your colors, theyre both underexposed (or maybe the lighting was just really shit).
>>3744071absolute shit
>>3744072yeah this too
>>3744074disagree with what Hank said. if you follow his instructions you risk ruining the out of focus plant that is in one which i like. i think this is a good photo, you're using composition ideas that beginners don't tend to think of. Look at some photos from Alec Soth's new book -- he plays around with this sort of composition a lot (see pic related).
>>3744082bad lighting and honestly this is a very bad subject. the colors are just bad to look at and there's nothing appealing here.
>>3744087no worries new friend. this is a perfectly good start. just keep taking more photos. that's the only way to get better.
>>3744100Out of focus, otherwise this wouldve been good shot (altho maybe a bit too much headspace). Check out Paul Graham's End of an Age for more photos like this.
>>3744216This is alright. I think taking photos of performers is very good practice for street photographers to overcome fear of candid portraits. i wish the drummer wasn't behind him though.
>>3744227I think this is a good frame but it's lacking a center subject to overcome all the chaos. Like if that person was instead wearing a more vivid color shirt and doing something more interesting, this could work a lot.
>>3744229Nah this doesn't work. This is just walls of nothing.
>>3744230Not a fan. I think this is pretty lazy composition.
>>3744231Taking panoramas isnt a sin but taking panoramas without justification is. You should come back and take more shots when there's more action going on
>>3744294has potential to be great if you include it in a sequence with like minded photos
