>>3993244>It could on the other lens.Yep, time for Sony to clean up the bugs in how they interact with 3rd party glass.
>Actually no. Different vendors program their motors differently with different levels of torque and tollerances for precision.Do I have to draw this in crayon for you? The Sony gave up focusing with the target COMPLETELY out of focus. It was not a near miss. There's no blaming this on the lens. This has nothing to do with Sigma's programming which, apparently is pretty damn close to Sony's given the equal performance in daylight.
>>model was never running!>They would have put the Sigma to the real tes tif they did. That was the point.OHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! NOW THE TEST YOU BROUGHT UP IS INVALID!!! Pic related. The absolute fucking STATE of the Sony shill.
>No retard. The Nikon lenses are specifically programmed to overshoot a bit, retract a bit, and then doing a final adjustment.>Nikon purposely programs their lenses to look like jerky shit on videoLOLOLOLOL where do you get this shit?
