>>3035804For one of the actual slides? I think I would settle for $150k. That's what I value a print run at so I think that would convince me to let go of the slide, heck I'd even through in a finished drum scan at that price.
>>3035809Thanks for the thoughts, man.
>>3035589 Yep, this one was Pawnee and we need to go there again. Of course on bike too.
>>3035606 This sort of shot was surprisingly hard to pull off on 4x5, it's that shallow even at f16.
I haven't forgotten about bike life at all! I brought it with me on the back of the van when I went to Appalachia and really loved riding through the autumn forests - and all the extra oxygen at low altitude. I left my schedule open at the very beginning of May, and since I've rode to Pawnee the last three years I want to go again. I think I want to go for three or four days this time to increase the chances of having a day where we don't get pummeled by a supercell with inches of hail. You interested?
>>3035826I do all my own film developing, it's really not all that bad. I did get a Jobo given to me a while back which definitely helps though. Where you going in TX and NM? Both states have beautiful desert terrain. Big Bend in TX is remote and wild, White Sands in NM is unlike any other place I've seen.
>>3035855Thanks anon, I have an Epson v700 that I've used for nearly 10 years now.
>>3035909I have considered doing scans for other people. Most labs charge between $75 and $150 for medium format and between $150 and $250 for 4x5... for a single scan. I'm thinking of doing other peoples scans for $40 for medium format (except for 6x17) and $75 for 4x5. I can get all the resolution and DR of a lab but I can't get the dust free environment so I could clean the files up later.
