>>4178748>The differences between them won't make or break a photowrong. the differences wont break a photo but will definitely make a photo. thats why you will hear all photographers who are even remotely successful, talk about having/using different lenses for different looks (not colors). every lens and/or more or less every manufacturer, designs for a different look.
thats why youll never see photographers like e.g rodrigo prieto, paul reiffer, bella kotak or michael muller, choose to shoot with a e.g sigma 105mm over a e.g canon/sony/zeiss/nikon or some random cine lens... to cut the story short; whats the point of e.g sigma 105mm or e.g the new 135mm samyang being super sharp and having all the '''MuH BooKeeeHHHh!!!11'' in the world, when lenses like 135mm GM, 135mm RF, 100mm RF, 100mm otus or even a $299 135mm mitakon make ten times better looking images.
you dont pick a lens to gearfag around and take 100000 FPS burst snapshits, you pick a lens to get the look that will help you create the image that you have in mind (provided the lens you picked HAS the look in the first place and is not just a cheap mess of muh sharpness and muh bokeh like the recent third party lenses from a number of different manufacturers)
