>>4476146yeah I've tried 800 but not 1600
feel like I might get better results by pulling it though
I bought two rolls each of Ilford's other films a few months ago for comparing, so as I make my way through those maybe I'll find something I like better
started a roll of delta 100 on the bronica but had a malfunction and haven't gotten back out to finish the roll since I fixed it
>>4476153>>4476156the biggest draw of the III for me is metadata on the negatives so I don't have to keep jotting stuff down in a notebook
which works great, except it doesn't record any focal length info
which probably makes sense given its intended use of churning through rolls in a studio setting
but it's mildly annoying for walking around and potentially changing lenses between each shot
or idk maybe they were working from the perspective that focal length doesn't matter to pros, only autists?
>once you start building out the lens setwhat lenses do you have for it?
fuji made a really bizarre selection of focal lengths for the system, there are so many that are closer together than you'll ever need
and why did they make two of the 3.2s so close (115-125-180) instead of splitting the difference (115-150-180)?
actually already bought a M80mm because a good one popped up on ebay (roberts camera)
also eyeing a 115/180 3.2 pair a jp seller has listed, which is a hefty chunk of change but I don't know if I should wait for a better deal
I recently learned my ebay saved searches weren't configured properly so I've missed out on keeping tabs on the lens market
