>>3751480I'm interested in stacking exposures together to make objects/scenes that don't exist. Whether its on film or digital of any system doesn't really matter because I'm going to end up with a bunch of unwanted artifacts regardless
its much more freeing to stack the shots after the fact than to try to get them all exposed on the same frame of film so I'd probably end up using the same process but with film scans, which realistically isn't going to be much different in the long run
also I'd rather spend more time shooting and stacking shots than developing and scanning film but thats not really as much of an issue
>>3751485but what about all the wonderful critique telling me to buy better gear or use film
