>>4367593Camera jpegs will never look that good no matter what you buy unless you spent all that money on a XXmp camera to use 1500x1000 jpegs, the better the computer processing the data the better the photo will look. The actual photos digital cameras take look like this. Each pixel is a 16 bit number that counts photons underneath a piece of colored glass, that's it. Then there's non-configurable aspects of the camera jpeg like fine chroma/luma NR adjustments, fine sharpening adjustments, and moire reduction algorithms, which are interactive controls on real computers raw editors because they significantly affect fine detail and tonal transitions.
>And yeah I've tried auto + back button focusing (using the ok button to track the subject)Nikon's 3d tracking on mirrorless sucks balls. Use single point like a DSLR, and REEE because a DSLR loses focus less often, then buy another camera and find out everything that's not a canon or newer sony is equally bad.
