>>3970194>>3970376Forgot the pic.
>>3970195>and no, DXO don't use a 50% figure, they use a 0db figure, ie, there is no signalHoly fucking shit, you don't even understand dB and yet you are posting about dynamic range measurements???
0dB is NOT "zero signal". A positive dB means signal is stronger than noise, and a negative dB means signal is weaker than noise. 0dB is literally the cross over point where signal and noise are each 50%.
https://www.sharetechnote.com/html/RF_Handbook_SNR.htmlhttps://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/52017/negative-signal-to-noise-ratiohttps://www.quora.com/What-is-the-meaning-of-a-negative-SNR-What-are-its-implications-for-wireless-communications>>Dynamic range corresponds to the ratio between the highest brightness a camera can capture (saturation) and the lowest brightness it can capture (which is typically when noise becomes more important than the signal — that is, a signal-to-noise ratio below 0 dBThey even fucking describe this in the section you quoted:
>WHICH IS TYPICALLY WHEN NOISE BECOMES MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE SIGNAL "More important than" pretty clearly means >50% of the total.
>THAT IS, A SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO BELOW 0 DBIf 0dB = "no signal at all" then there could be nothing below 0dB.
