>>4179154But it doesn't rangefind. It could, it wouldn't take a lot. The technology has existed for 100 years and has been miniaturized to the extremes. There's some space there where a very weak flash is, it's more than possible especially with no IBIS or full frame sensor taking up space. But they didn't do it.
They used a shitty electronic imitation.
It's a rangefinder missing the single most useful part - the part where it fully encompasses all of your camera usage. By allowing you to find the distance to the subject. You see, winogrand and HCB preferred a leica with a rangefinder over a plain piece of glass with frame lines for a reason. The world moves too fast for zone focusing to keep up with. And digital displays are unquestionably an inferior alternative to any optical system.
