Quoted By:
>expensive camera bad! ITS NOT BETTER ENOUGH!
The results are in this thread, you can tell they're better. If you can't afford them or just don't care about the quality gains, just don't buy them. Please shut up about your delusions about how the grapes must be sour, or just not any sweeter than the easier to pick fruit. It's annoying, egotistical cope.
"Look at how much money you spent and it didn't even make me happy" was right.
U rike money? Pic related is the second biggest way photographers lose money. Sometimes they go broke from this. The concept you are seeing in this image is disappointment.
When photographers get talked into buying something crappy because the internet told them "skill issue" and "just as good" "it doesnt matter, equivalence!" - or go way over budget and probably dont even do photography or care about it - they set themselves up for disappointment. Cameras, lenses, and flashes all up on ebay or traded to mbp. The disappointed photographers loss ranges from 12% to 40%.
The #1 way photographers go broke is buying "companion" gear to cover a use case their original camera sucked at. This usually means disappointment with two cameras.
It doesnt matter what you buy, as long as you are 100% sure you won't buy more cameras. When you see "autofocus not as good" "lenses are very expensive for mediocre performance and massive size" "poor quality at high ISOs" etc, and feel it is enough for you to start the copes: "SKILL ISSUE, EQUIVALENCE, ON INSTAGRAM, YOU'RE NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO NEED..." turn around. Call your boss. Tell him you're interested in taking on some overtime. Wait for prices to drop. Buy something you will 100% never want to trade in or shelve.
If you aren't sure you don't want MF's superior ISO performance just do not buy it. If you are disappointed with FF's ISO performance, just do not buy it. No matter what, DO NOT become disappointed. NEVER COPE. You can and will destroy your life if you cope too much. Buy once, cry once.
