>>4271039>$1200 for a 90mm f2.4 equivalent>$700+ used (oof, and it launched at $1400)Sure, it's a good lens, one of the few that is actually almost sharp enough to keep up with the average full frame lens' look with larger pixels, but that's nothing special for something so expensive and large competing with $350 85mm f1.8s. Trying to gain lens speed on micro four thirds turns it into micro fool turds. But wait
the f1.8 version is 1/3 the size, 1/10th the price
1/2 the resolution
And isn't weather sealed.
Lolympiss/om-shitstem is an absolute joke of a brand and shit like this lens is why I will never go back
from panasonic
