>>3183423True, though some things get a bit fuzzy doing that. Best example is the resizing between
>>3183350 and
>>3183375 A lot of people crop instead since they can't get super macro on their setup and/or the framing isn't as nice as they like. I re-compress most of mine. Those are the ones ITT with a lower case letter after the filename. With my D3400 I must do that since the jpg files are 10-11mb originally. Photos from my old Coolpix are mostly 3-5mb so I rarely need to re-compress them to post on /p/ (like this one).
