>>2857051if you actually knew how to read exif, you'd know it's not "really" iso 800 in the first place. It's a dynamic range setting/exposure bias.
Luckily for you, though, I also shot it metered for 200, for you imbeciles that have no idea what you're talking about on a level deeper than a tumblr infographic.
Be sure to compare them side by side. :^)
