>>3870942>>3871420>D2Xdxoweenie
Humans look at images. Did you ever think to do human testing, you nerd?
I get so tired of it, yes, the camera is better at measuring the chemical composition of a tree or whatever, but that's not our use for cameras, is it? We're looking for HUMANS to look at the PICTURES and actually like what they see. Or, in some cases, to just agree it represents it as they saw it.
You may pass this off, and say it's a display issue, or a printing issue, but over-resolution and over-tonality results in all kinds of BARF - in some cases. Sometimes high resolution works out okay.
But think about the Zorn palette next time you read those autism numbers from dxoweeniesperg.
