so basically, Terry purchasing that property for $3 million in 2009
proves wrong all the jellyfags on here, that were posting years ago, Terry made nothing!
the "$58 million a year" from:
https://petapixel.com/2013/08/15/terry-richardson-says-he-stands-to-lose-hundreds-of-thousands-in-gaga-case/must be legit?
so does that mean Terry might have been the highest paid photographer in all of history?
who banked more than him....bruce weber?
