>>4029546$4,000 camera vs. $1,500 camera vs $1,000 camera vs. $1,800 camera at ISO 12,800.
mft is btfo at both ends. The Fuji MF is better than the FF, but not 2.6x better. Meanwhile mft looks like shit by comparison to either.
>but muh 5dsr is an old camera!!!That you can still actually buy new. But point taken, an R5 is like $3,900 and a Z7ii around $2,900. They are also damn close to MF while mft is damn close to a cell phone.
This anon
>>4029252 is right. m43 doesn't make sense outside of those two scenarios. I'll add video. There are some competitive m43 options for video. But if you're a hybrid shooter you're going to want FF for stills, so you might as well go FF for video and share a single lens system.
m43 is the least flexible system with the lowest IQ. Cope and seethe with that.
