>>3173477>Do you really think you'd be the first person to notice the a6300, a camera much more popular than the bodies it's known to affect, has the same issue?Read the internet, the issue is well documented on the A7, but IS ALSO KNOWN to affect the a6xxx. It's just talked less, because obviously, people doing serious astrophoto on dedicated forums all use A7x.
What was unsure is if the issue appeared on the a6xxx after firmware updates like on the A7 line, or if it was already there from the very beginning. hence my question in the OP.
As it appears,
>>3172702>>3172703did some testing with its 2.0 firmware, and I did
>>3173164my own testing with my 1.0 firwmare. No wind whatsoever.
Same issue can be seen, and it did show up in all my samples @4s.