>>4120565>[laughs in leica]Those are system cameras not compacts unless you mean the Q2.
>it turns out there's several versions of the rx1, my mistake. But a fixed lens is still sad. If sony had a larger mount they could make an ILC that size. Instead they have to design around a business decision.A larger mount wouldn't make the camera smaller, only the lenses.
>No, that's the time women can last before calling the cops on you since you have yet to learn that most women are weirded out by giant cameras unless they're already used to it. It's the difference between you being well dressed for the weather and showing up dressed like neo.kek, sounds like more carrot top tier premature ejaculator cope
>With noticeable quality falloff. If you're going to have meh prints why bother? They do not sufficiently mog phones.They are, the dynamic range is superior.
>What is crop factor? It's not just cropping the image. The diaphram and focal length really are physically smaller. An f1.4 opening on APS-C is actually the same physical size of an f2.8 opening on FF. You're so wrong, kek. Don't you know you can use FF lenses on APS-C cameras? The result is the same as cropping the equivalent sensor area on the FF one. Same F-stop gives the same light intensity over the sensor and the same DoF. You've been misled by equivalence, yet another thing you don't understand.
The 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron, predictably, has a 35mm front element. It's as big as a 50/1.4.
