>>3313030interestingly mealy bokeh. not a sharp image at all, thumbnail especially. scale that baby down to 720
>>3311939sigh
>>3311888obvious photoshop job is obvious
>>3311140cute fuzzy boi.
that 200mm makes a lovely background but it's not as sharp as I'd expect from a full-frame photo at 200m and f/5.6. what lens is it?
>>3311123>>3311120street photo is a better photo, the bedroom view is boring. nice clouds though, decent exposure
>>3311105lovely but rotate the frame counterclockwise like 0.2 degrees
>>3311106nice work
>>3311109underexposed, yeah. go edit it more
>>3311111good
>>3311113best. i don't even care about the unrecoverably blown sky. good work.
>>3311089nice! cc: if you're gonna shoot with the lens wide open, try shooting your subject from a bit farther away and closer to the center of the lens, and then crop in. you have 20 megapixels to work with on that 7D, and I'd rather be viewing it at 720p anyway, so use that big sensor for something practical
>>3311057I 2nd the other guy about getting a reflector, he's right and I need to get one for myself too. do you have the plastic 50mm lens? stop that baby down to like f/3.5
>>3311048overexposed, take your shutter and aperture up 1 or 2 stops each
