>>3012869>Fuji pay dxo NOT to test their gearConspiracies much? Oh right, you have turned your brain into a mush, should've guessed.
>>3012854Here's a link.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/fujinon/xf-16mm-f1.4-r-wr/review/>>3012855Sorry, but I take the measured results from imaging resource much more serious than some blogs pictures of a bookshelf. And in your opinion it's better to almost resolve the sensor than completely resolving the sensor? Or what ever the fuck. Which gives sharper images? It doesn't matter. Wide open corner resolution is the least important measure of a lens performance, because that does not matter in real world use. Who's the noob again? And why the fuck are you so hung up on that one specialty lens? Why don't you bitch about the 58/1.4 Nikkor then which is utter garbage by your standards? All this proves is that you don't actually take any pictures.
I can make stupid irrelevant screenshots of "real world subjects" as well, here you go faggot.
