>>4245632you're right, if the background isn't just one huge bokeh ball then the photo is unusable
>>4245633Here it is stopped all the way down to f/0.95, it does lose a little sharpness as you would expect, but it's an extremely sharp lens to begin with so you're starting from a pretty good place. What most people would probably have an issue with is that you can get a bit of chromatic aberration when you're wide open, though I find this happens for the most part in harsh light. Keep in mind my example is the mk1 of this lens, there is a newer one that has a toggle for switching between smooth and clicky aperture ring operation, it may also be optically better but I don't know about that.
These are all also with that lens
>>4242762>>4242784>>4242787>>4243705 