>>2691098I genuinely like the idea of having a digital camera with no screen. I just wish that it would make the camera cheaper, not more expensive.
The only other digital camera I've seen without a screen is a shitty one that I had in the early 2000's that held about 20-30 really poor quality photos in internal memory. You had to hope the batteries didn't die before you copied them to your computer too, because if they died or you took them out, all your photos would be gone.
Similar to pic related, but it was round instead of rectangular
