>>3647836>They look almost like phone snapshits with the colours and temperature way off.oh, I also forgot to mention, this kinda reveals more about your newfag perspective on photography
you sincerely believe phones can't take good photographs, that "looks like a phone took it" is a profound insult
Go take a look at Cruz' recent thread of phone snaps. Phones are perfectly capable cameras in this day and age, I'd argue more capable than a newfag with a DSLR he doesn't understand.
What you're actually trying to express here is that my images are not shallow DoF portraits or whatever it is that you think "good cameras" are used for.
The reason to use a real camera instead of a phone in the year of our 'rona 2020 is for ergonomics, easy access to controls, or for more capable low-light performance. It's hardly about image quality at all anymore, unless "image quality" to you is a stand-in for "the ability to use a wide open normal lens for max bowkayz"
You're communicating more than you realize with the things you think are put-downs
