>>4284134 (OP)its a nice shot, gives off heavy 1910-1920's european countryside film photography vibes, also love the implied story telling elements to it but dont know whether that was intentional or not, whatever the case good job with that, shot is also nicely composed but you could have framed it or angled it much better, especially considering how the foreground and background is all grass, trees and greenery and just blend into each other too much for this type of shot. also dont like the lack of grain, you could have added just a tiny bit more grain for that authentic film vibe, falsely implying you did film to digital conversion.
also, i dont know the location but if the entire background was just greenery and forests, i would have lowered the shot and walked a bit to the right and placed the table at 1/4 size, completely filling the bottom right part of the image with it. maybe could have even gotten in some of the sky or even better clouds too if there were any.
>>4284138>Table is in the shadowthats the point now isnt it. makes the image that much better. your other two complains are valid and i agree with you.
>put the table closer to the centerdont agree with this one either. for this type of shot, table in the center of the image would just look terrible, especially in the context of a nature+countryside shot like this.
>Get close to and isolate your subject, the more it fills the frame the betterthis is just one of thousands of possible compositions and just one way to shoot something. terrible tldr advice.
