>>4076763>???>Do you have a carer?You were shilling a full frame camera for a guy who has APS-C lenses with the excuse that it automatically crops. The other parts you quoted from
>>4076738 who isn't me, but I'll own you anyways.
>Can you explain why photos from a 12mp A7S and 61mp A7Riv look 99% identical on a 4k screen with the same lens, yet the difference between an OK and a good lens is immediately apparent on both bodies?4K is roughly 8MP. It gets outresolved by the A7S. It also gets outresolved by the Olympus E-30, that has a Four Thirds sensor (roughly 1/4 the size of full frame) and lenses that perform well on digital BY DESIGN because they were designed from the ground up taking the peculiarities of digital and its consequences on the optical path into account.
>Can you even give any example of when you needed more than 12mp from your final image?Printing, cropping.
>Apart from of course, being able to shoot with the same level of noise in HALF as much light.There's less than half as much light indoors than in broad daylight, several EVs less. Half as much light is one stop, it means jackshit.
>full frame is better in every way than crop, unless you're doing greater than 1:1 macro. It can do everything a crop camera can do, and twice as much more.False.
>At the end of the day, all you've written in your replies are desperate half truths to try and justify owning a crop camera when objectively better is available and affordable to OP.The pot calling the kettle black. A full frame camera wouldn't be better or affordable to OP, OP has APS-C lenses and doesn't want to spend money on lenses for now.
