>>4352589>which one?ZM Quartz, in really nice condition.
>test it alongside a reliable lightmeter and check to see if it's not quite rightdon't have a dedicated one since I just started film photography. But I had the idea earlier of using the one from my mirrorless cameras and it gave similar results so seems to be alright
>good, get your negatives back and if anything weird appears, check them firstI will get them developed and scanned, will get tiff files
>But if you're not a jittery shivering fuck you can shoot handheld at slower speeds than thatI think I have somewhat shaky hands, that's why I am concerned
