>>3554406You heard it was shit by people who can't afford it. It's an absolutely fantastic piece of kit, if you can afford it, it's bad ass. You basically get a D4 at a 1/3 of the cost because it doesn't have the D4's AF or video. It's the purist's camera who doesn't want to pay Leica prices.
>>3554238I was really hoping for a digital S3 but they dropped the ball with their Z mount so okay then. I get it though, you have to build what the general public will buy, not some elitist pricks on a Norwegian whaling forum.
>>3554194From what I understand, basically when Nikon designed the camera they raided their parts bin for a lot of the components to control costs. It has the AF from a D7000 for the record.
If you have the money, absolutely buy it. It's not a meme camera, it's the closest you will get to shooting 35mm without actually shooting 35mm. Low light performance is exceptional, this pic was handheld at ISO3200
