>>3346519Get a polariser and go easy on the teals. I like the photo but the split toning is very obvious and overdone.
>>3346546What that other guy said, shouldn't be pink and blue
>>3346714>that 20 year old boomer who puts 100 saturation on his greens and pushes them all the way to the right>>3346717Not sure what the subject is, but there's nothing wrong with the colors or the exposure. Did it really need to be 6000x4000 though?
>>3346735Not into this sort of stuff, but it's a good shot. /fa/ wou like this
>>3346740Fix the horizon and the saturation
>>3346747I like this a lot
>>3346758original was better
>>3346764no subject but kinda pleasant to look at
>>3346765It's a pet shot, but you focused on the eyes so that's good. Greens are a bit neon looking, maybe push them like 10 points to the left
>>3346769Kinda weird that there are birds of pray just casually flying around your work. It looks like it's in the city between tall buildings.
>>3346771Cool shot, but my eyes didn't instantly find the subject. You need a polariser for this kind of light.
>>3346803I love this
>>3346978Nice shot and exposure, but for the love of god fix those greens.
>>3347015Would have been better if you got a bit lower and tilted the camera up a bit
>>3347020I don't know anything about model photography, but I don't like her face
>>3347023There are no details in the shadows and no details in the highlights. Try bracketing and drop the B&W.
>>3347045I like this, the blacks are a bit too black but otherwise don't worry about it, colors look fine
>>3347070>>3347206>adding grain on purpose 