>>4094395You must have a PhD in film archival because you sure seem to know everything about how film ages.
Except you definitely don't because you've spent this whole thread talking out of your ass. Apparently 40y/o film "going bad" just obviously means the triacetate has gone brittle and not the film can't record images even though literally everyone took it to mean the latter because that's what film "going bad" means you knuckle-dragging retard.
If you have your own idiosyncratic definitions for common terms then you need to make that clear and not sperg out when people get confused.
