>>3901522>Only 75 1.8 would beat a Nikon 50mm 1.8 gWrong, pic related. (Inb4 you get upset with a method for measuring system resolution invented by the French space agency, and make yourself look even more stupid and bitter)
Your £849 lens gets destroyed for resolution and has slightly higher chromatic aberration (3um2 is a bigger percentage of a mft sensor than 8um2 on FF), both have negligible distortion (even though we're comparing a telephoto to a normal), by Nikon's ancient £150, widely considered as shite, lens.
You can buy a d800 2nd hand, and a 2nd hand 50mm 1.8, and still have money left over for a flash or 2ne lens for the price of that one Olympus lens.
That's cringe and hilarious.
