>>4162711i'm not an expert but that seems plenty thorough
>>4162779i have the 10-24. it's meh in terms of image... between that and the 16/1.4, i'd pick the 16 unless you specifically want to go wider. there's also the viltrox 13/1.4 which i think also has better iq than the 10-24
>>4161795does the xro ovf do anything special with af?