>>2576892Err no?
The sony can do 14.2, the nikon 14.4 stops of dr. Where are you getting this 3 stops nonsense?
Optically inferior? You've seen the otus, loxia and batis line right? Overpriced? You've seen the sony a mount basic lineup of primes right? And that sony have been filing patents for new lenses at a ridiculously high rate? You've also heard that sigma are committed to also doing ff e mount lenses, at both the low and high end of budgets?
Compression or not, canons raws still suck in comparison AND they take up more space, gg.
Do you have any real life example of sonys compression affecting a shot?
>>2576910Correct, wrong facts troll is wrong, and buttmad.
