>>2577309It think it's a bit of judder on a couple of the faster tilts/pans (this is sort of the kicker of small cameras [you can tilt/pan them really fast on movement - but because of the nature of how the shutter works it's a sort of half-frame mid-movement]).
It's really minor though (most people won't notice it unless they frame-by frame it).
>>2576993nice!
You may want support for it to be a bit easier to handle on the overall (more balanced, less movement on the part of the lens [especially if there is any play in the mount/adapter]).
How does the glass perform/which adapter are you using? (been really tempted to pick one of these up).
>>2577103Those are great (specifically for the BM cameras as they don't deal with IR pollution particularly well), but I'd also look into a Variable ND for more run'n gun type stuff.
>>2576847Yes. Multiple ways, most people usually get a lens support that attaches to 15mm rods.
>>2576209>>2576368It's a tough decision.
Personally, for one-man band/single camera type of stuff I'd go with the 24-105mm (nice zoom range, less lens swapping) since you may be able push the ISO a bit higher to compensate (say, ISO1600 should be fine for most situation, 3200+ on the C100 when you get there).
