>>2573320Sure, bro. Here's my two cents:
>>2572952It's not a bad idea, but the geometry just doesn't really work. The whole thing feels imbalanced. Too much white nothing on the left side and the position and direction of the leg doesn't draw the eye.
>>2572954I REALLY wish you were more centered. Also, she's underexposed. When shooting a shot like this, fuck the window. Doesn't matter if it gets blown out. Just make sure she's exposed properly. Here, she's too dark. Otherwise the pose is nice.
>>2572956Same as the last shot. Way too dark. Decent straight on shot, though.
>>2572958Her leg blends in with the bed. Visually it's confusing. Also, I'm not sure what you're trying to accentuate here.
>>2572959Nope. Because of the shallow DoF, I focus on her neck. I don't think that's what you were going for. Trash it.
>>2572961Meh. Decent pose. Her head is cut off at a weird spot.
>>2572963That glare could work in some shots, but here it's just distracting. Also, she's still too dark.
>>2572965Not a bad idea, but forget that crazy shallow DoF. It's amateur-tier shit.
>>2572966Sexy shot if you like feet, and the DoF actually works well here. I would have her feet not so close to the edge of the frame, and I'd have her angled slightly more to the right to fill up the frame.
>>2572969Sexy wordrobe. Cutting off her hip/ass makes her leg look fucking huge, though.
>>2572971Angle is just weird.
