>>4453359Kek, I use an average gear to get from point A to B getting results.
If you don't wanna think while taking a photo, why bother buying a camera? Just raise your hand and press the phone button pal.
>>4453360This
>>4453361Also true, but it doesn't have to be noring either. Think of a mom making a video, vs something more cinematic. Both create memories, not art.
>>4453362Gear makes a difference for people who likes to compare the minimal details. Honestly, any aps-c photo will look decent, even if compared to fool frame ones with professional grade lenses.
In real life no one gives a damn about what you use or if your photo has 10% more or less quality, even professionally.
I could totally work with unreliable gear as it doesn't limit the purpose of taking a picture in the first place, which is freezing memories. I wouldn't because of other factors like comfort and ease of use, and it has nothing to do with minor details like DR and color depth difference.
Even lenses are a meme desu, depth of field became overused long ago and you can do portraits with f/4 zooms and get competitive results.
Even for sports indoors, just get an average camera and raise your ISO.
If you can't work with an f/4 zoom, it's skill issue.
