>>4452387k3k, you don't get half of what I said as expected.
>All conscious and intuitive composition follows rulesetsDoesn't have to. You can simply put something somewhere because it looks good there.
>So using rules is bad but it's also not bad? Every photo is going for a specific style.Using basic bitch rules as a crutch because you can't compose for shit is bad. Deliberately using specific rules to create cohesion between shots can be good if innovative enough. Let's say for example every shot in a set has something placed at the same area.
>This word salad says literally nothing. Kamala-tier. Biden-tier. Trump-tier. Senile babble. I'm saying some people compose without realizing they're doing it, and then they dismiss composition as something pointless because they do it unconsciously.
>Filler statementIt's really not. Just look at some of the thoughtless snapshits that get posted here.
>You are unable to prove you do this.It's self evident.
>Man who has never made anything resembling art or even journalism attempts to define art to mean only things he likesI've never shared much more than crops and throwaways here, doesn't mean I've never done it.
>Another non-statement. Bidentrumpharris tier senile babble. You are dumber than a politician.If you're doing the genres I mentioned you compose from the moment you craft the scene to photograph. You put the things where you want them or you place yourself at the right place for the composition you want and the right time of the day for the light to hit where you want it in landscape's case. This isn't some well guarded secret but common knowledge.
