/p/ - Photography » Searching for posts that contain ‘panasonic’ and that are only OP posts.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 01-widget-waterproof-cameras-6301.jpg, 60KiB, 630x420

Waterproof Cameras that actually take good photos

Anonymous Thu 14 Jul 2016 05:04:04 No.2882748 View View Report

Quoted By:

For those of you who like the outdoors and photography, is there a camera that's going to satisfy me ? I've had a Sony RX100M3 for a year now and it was great for traveling, but it's been damaged in the rain.

I would like to look at a waterproof DSLR but that's above my skill level. However if i pick up a cheap panasonic or olympus tough camera, I feel like I'll drop a fair way back in image quality.

What's the middle ground ?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO panasonic_dmc_g7kk_lumix_dmc_g7_ (...).jpg, 564KiB, 2500x2500

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 05:50:01 No.2879525 View View Report

Quoted By:

Looking to buy my first camera for amature photography but more so for video making. I hear the Panasonic G7 is better than the a6000 for video, but besides the appeal of the a6000 being the compact size and design, am I an idiot for wanting the sony because of the brand?

Panasonic just has a bad connotation in my head. It just sounds old and cheap to me. It's the brand of CRT your grandma had. Sony, their website, their branding, their cameras and lenses, it all just looks good. I feel like no matter what, I'll be slightly dissatisfied with the Panasonic just because of that.

Is that a dumb reason to choose the a6000 over the G7? I do prefer the a6000 size more, but other than that, the G7 checks way more video boxes except the autofocus, but I don't know how substantially better the a6000's autofocus is in comparison.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO G7.jpg, 416KiB, 2880x1616

Anonymous Sat 02 Jul 2016 19:47:15 No.2874575 View View Report

Quoted By:

Just bought the Panasonic G7, what should I expect from it?
(Video only)

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 61gMrtRqJFL._SL1500_.jpg, 100KiB, 1000x1000

Anonymous Thu 30 Jun 2016 00:31:47 No.2872817 View View Report

Quoted By:

Hi /p/

What's the difference between these to adapters that should make my Minolta lens work on my pannys?

https://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Adapter-Minolta-Olympus-Panasonic/dp/B003EAVULQ
https://www.amazon.it/Fotodiox-Adattatore-Minolta-Obiettivo-Fotocamera/dp/B003EAVULQ

Will the lack of the stabilisation make a great difference?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 310120121001-1327952864panasonic (...).jpg, 208KiB, 800x598

timelapse on Lumix dc vario

Anonymous Fri 03 Jun 2016 18:59:55 No.2854886 View View Report

Quoted By:

sup /p/,
I'm coming to you, camera experts, because I am looking for a way of getting the most out of a lumix dc vario for timelapse. the software seems to cap the amount of pictures taken in a timelapse to 1000 while I need to go on for much longer.
The reason I stick to this camera is because we are setting a huge amount of those underwater in order to aquire fish abundance data (and we already have 20 of them). I have used CHDK on a canon camera before to make timelapse possible for thousands of photos, but I couldn't put my fingers on any similar tools for a panasonic lumix.

you guys got advice?
thx /p/ros

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO panasonic_lumix_dmc_tz70_review- (...).jpg, 44KiB, 275x217

Compact Digital Camera

Anonymous Mon 16 Nov 2015 17:42:02 No.2704810 View View Report

Quoted By:

Hey /p/ I'm looking to buy a compact digital for travelling and just general photo taking when going places. I've done some research and now turn to you for advice.

I've shortlisted two cameras, the Sony HX60 and the Panasonic TZ70. Just wondering if anyone had any feedback on either of them? Or maybe suggestions for other models I've overlooked.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO panasonic_lumix_dmc_lz40_digital (...).jpg, 346KiB, 2500x2500

Anonymous Mon 16 Nov 2015 13:08:36 No.2704704 View View Report

Quoted By:

Hello everyone.

I recently bought a panasonic dmc lz40, first of all im not a photographer nor do i have any knowledge of photography.

I bake for a living.

I make cakes cupcakes things like that, and its the pictures that sell mostly.

Ive been trying to take pics with this cam for a few days now and while pictures do look better than my previous cam food doesnt look as appetizing as i had hoped.

Now it doesnt have to look cool or flashy the food just needs to look appetizing, how do i go about doing this on this specific cam?

Any help would be gladly apreciated.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO maxresdefault.jpg, 58KiB, 1280x720

Anonymous Sun 25 Oct 2015 18:55:18 No.2691744 View View Report

Quoted By:

Video gear thread:

I need the best video recording dslr under 1500 dollars.
I've read several articles, I've read about rolling shutters and global shutters, about ISO, about exposure, about magic lantern, about lens selections but im so confused....

I want to shoot independent low budget films but I must make them exceptional. My film school will be able to give me gear but I still need my own decent camera to not have to rely on it all the time(I will use them for accessories like stabilizers etc..).

I've read some good stuff about the Canon EOS 70D.
What about the Canon EOS 6D?
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4? I have read some good reviews of it but also some buyers who had some problems with it that rendered it unusable.
What about the Sony A77II?
I have read that Sony have less lenses but if im not looking for anything on the fringe will their lenses do? should I even be worried about it?

I might want to do some rapid movement shooting with it so I prefer it to be as capable as possible in that regard, even above overall image and color reproduction qualities.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO lumix-smart-camera-dmc-cm1_panas (...).png, 195KiB, 620x413

Anonymous Fri 25 Sep 2015 23:03:23 No.2674420 View View Report

Quoted By:

High-End Image Quality
20MP 1-inch Sensor / LEICA DC Elmarit Lens/Venus Engine FHD
Easy Operation
Manual Ring / "Ready to Shoot" camera switch / 4.7-inch Full-HD Touch LCD
Communication Functions
Android™ 4.4 KitKat® / Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 801 2.3GHz (Quad-Core) / LTE

Thinking about getting the Panasonic CM1. Long shot but anyone had a go on it?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO _1070011_1.jpg, 172KiB, 640x474

navitar 12.5mm f1.3

Anonymous Wed 09 Sep 2015 17:19:01 No.2665542 View View Report

Quoted By:

I recently bought this "navitar 12.5mm f1.3", it's a c-mount lens that should fit the entire sensor on my panasonic gf2
using two different adapters found on ebay the result is really bad
it won't focus more distant than a meter and so the image is blur

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 58_1035_residential_architectura (...).jpg, 252KiB, 1637x1200

Anonymous Tue 08 Sep 2015 04:46:07 No.2664451 View View Report

Quoted By:

I just got a Panasonic GH2 and want to start taking photographs of the interior of houses but I'm a complete noob and have a few questions on lenses.

I want a wide angle lens to make up for the gh2's smaller sensor size so I was looking at the Panasonic Lumix 14mm f/2.5
I was wondering if this would be a good lens to start a small business shooting the interior of houses with?
Also, is there any way to shoot with a deep depth of field with this sort of lens or should i consider buying Panasonic's 14-42mm f/3.5 -5.6 lens as it has a higher f-stop? Does the f-stop difference matter that much?

Like i said I'm a real noob at this so any wisdom would be appreciated, thankyou

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO iYOXpB3.gif, 270KiB, 452x332

Anonymous Sun 06 Sep 2015 00:33:37 No.2662975 View View Report

Quoted By:

I bought a Olympus 55mm f1.2 from the 70s for a few bucks on a flee market. It has a OM-bajonett. OM used full frame film (24x36mm). Then I bought an OM to M4/3 adapter. I put the lens on my motion picture camera, which has a sensor of 17x13mm, which is a crop factor of 2; standard for m4/3. So I expected an effective focal length of 110mm (in relation to a full frame size).

But after I compared the field of view with a Panasonic 14-140mm M4/3 lens, it showed that it is more or less the same like 55mm on that M4/3 lens. A little bit more, 58 or 60 ca.

I always assumed, that if Panasonic sells a lens for the m4/3 standard, the value for the focal length is converted to the 2x crop factor. So, in their product description panasonic says e.g. it is a 25mm lens, and they add that that is equal 50mm on full frame. Which means, that if you want to have the same angle on a 2x larger sensor, you have to use the double focal length.

Sooo, if this is correct, why the hell gives my old Olympus 55mm lens the same angle on my m4/3 sensor, like my Panasonic 55mm (zoom) lens?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO download.jpg, 6KiB, 243x207

Anonymous Wed 19 Aug 2015 13:02:29 No.2651224 View View Report

Quoted By:

Sorry, gear thread.

I have an rx100 mk2 that I've taken all over. I'm constantly impressed with the quality of images, after years lugging around a dslr, I'd finally found a compact alternative but.. my last trip left me wanting something with a little more reach.

A friend just purchased a Panasonic TZ70 which I had high hopes for but upon testing I was really disappointed with the quality of the images.

So any decent superzooms out there with a good sensor? I am willing to sacrifice a little portability but don't want a dslr sized bridge.

Budget is up to £1000/$1500

Thanks

tl;dr - Any superzoom with good sensor?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1090089.jpg, 693KiB, 2160x1620

Something inside the lens

Anonymous Mon 10 Aug 2015 15:51:51 No.2644754 View View Report

Quoted By:

Hello friends.
This is the 1st time I'm on this board so bare with me.
I have a Panasonic DMC TZ18 and lately all my pictures have that spot on them. I'm guessing there's something inside the lens.
Can I fix this myself?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 41CyHDZfihL.jpg, 30KiB, 500x400

Canon Vixia hf r400 vs Panasonic HC-V550K

Anonymous Thu 06 Aug 2015 21:21:22 No.2642277 View View Report

Quoted By:

Canon Vixia hf r400 vs Panasonic HC-V550K?

Been looking for a good camcorder under $400. One big thing I want to know is if the HC's viewfinder swivels around to where you can see it from the front of the camera.

Other than that, thoughts, opinions? Which is better, why?

Filming at night in low light is a factor for me as well.

I'm leaning towards the Panasonic

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO ZPR-NIKON-J5-FRONTLEFT.jpg, 199KiB, 1024x867

More Mirrorless Bullshittery

Anonymous Sat 01 Aug 2015 18:20:42 No.2638440 View View Report

Quoted By:

Sorry in advance lol

I need a multi-use smallish camera, I'm having a hard time deciding between models. I haven't had a camera since an ancient Panasonic P&S and using phone bullshit!

My needs are immediately for a trip to Iceland soon, so something a bit durable and lightER, but I'd also like to have good rep of things indoors, especially for art photography and ...cat pics.

My price range inches toward $800USD, but I'd prefer something between $4-600. Some models I've been looking at are Mirrorless like the following:
Nikon 1 J5/Sony A6000/Panasonic Lumix GM5
but I become really torn looking at DSLR like the Nikon ranges D32/3300 or 52/5300 and shrugging a bit at the lower Pentax K-50/K S1 models...I definitely want something small and quick with great indoor/low light performance to get pics of art for modest print purposes, or fast shots (ie powering on/time between shots/focus) of things like landscape or objects out in the wild for art references. This pretty much makes looking at DSLR pretty idiotic for the size of them and kit I know, I just mourn the "better quality" final images for less cost in the body kind of....batteries and life are another area of trouble.

I like the Nikon J5 and Panasonic GM5 for looks cause I'm a huge faggot (but all the manual control dials are +++), the Sony A6000 is nice but I want to nix it off my list for being a little too delicate for travel (and no removable battery?). Neg points on the J5 I find in some reviews are the flash placement for longer lenses, and the Panasonic seems unduly expensive.

A co-worker recc'd I try a Canon G16, but it had some short comings that made it less exciting for me.

I would just really appreciate help in finding or narrowing down something more versatile camera/lens option than a P&S you know? Is it just too soon to pick up a Mirrorless model at more justifiable cost/performance??

Thanks in advance!

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 11421-kodakc1803quart.jpg, 43KiB, 500x410

Noob question

Anonymous Mon 13 Jul 2015 17:11:40 No.2625150 View View Report

Quoted By:

Morning /p/

I've got noob question. I'm amateur/enthusiast of photography. I've been using very shitty photo camera for past 5-6 years - Kodak C180 that has cost me back then 60$.

I would like to get new photo camera but I've got limited budget. I have only about 100$-125$. I was thinking of something like Panasonic DMC-XS3 but I'd welcome any suggestions.

The question is - will I notice any difference? Both cameras are rubbish but I'm hoping that 5-6 years time gap means progress for lens and so on.

I'm taking pictures mostly indoor and with rather low light. The biggest issue with current camera is that only one out of maybe 5 pictures is sharp and focused (even if I switch on all the light sources in the room). There are also tons of noise.

TLDR: Suggest me best possible camera for 100$-125$. Is there going to be difference in quality between it and Kodak C180?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 797KiB, 2448x2448

Anonymous Tue 26 May 2015 01:02:05 No.2590941 View View Report

Quoted By:

Heya, I was looking to get into taking good photos, I was suggested a Panasonic gf7. Any suggestions here if it's better to go for a mirrorless or dslr? In the $700 - $1200 price range? It will mostly be for outdoor activities, portraits, and events. Of people doing things

!!1Elwvva3+Mw

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO cameras.jpg, 778KiB, 1500x1000

Pre-summer clean FREE SHIT GIVEAWAY

!!1Elwvva3+Mw Wed 06 May 2015 22:59:56 No.2577865 View View Report

Quoted By:

Sup /p/eeps, long time no see.

I was wondering if you guys collect cameras... I have a couple of stuff I need to get rid of. It's free, but you pay for shipping because I'm broke.

I have all these instamatics, they're worth shit, but they look cute. Some of them work, but of course there's no film so only as decoration. So yeah, i would like to give all these to the same person, rather than giving them individually. less effort.

Also, other things that i'll post pics in the following posts. available for grabs:
-49mm, 55mm, 62mm polarizer filters
-bell & howell 319 - 8mm camera
-PANASONIC 1.3 MEGAPICKLES PALMCAM ! USES SUPER DISK HOLY SHIT NIGGER! THIS MONSTER WORKS! READ THE FOLLOWING POST TO SEE DETAILS!
-LOMO-like camera, Holga clone is it?

If you are interested in any of these, email me with your zipcode so i can calculate shipping costs.

[email protected]

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO pga.jpg, 946KiB, 1920x1080

Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ-1000 Full HD Slow Motion

Anonymous Wed 06 May 2015 07:23:03 No.2577507 View View Report

Quoted By:

Testing my new Panasonic FZ1000 full HD slow motion feature...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhEUgY5FVU

Firtst video with some epic music

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 9504233340_1ca7dd6572_k.jpg, 1MiB, 2048x1538

Cameras and feels

Anonymous Sun 03 May 2015 02:55:44 No.2575406 View View Report

Quoted By:

I am comparing 2 cameras, the Panasonic GX-7 and the Fujifilm X-A2.
Similar kind of cameras and similar pricepoints, but the GX-7 wins by a landslide in all the reviews I have seen.

However, the "feelings" that each camera transmite are very different.
The photos I have seen made with a GX-7 seem to have an higher quality. They look like made by photo-studios. Hi-res photos, soft features, a bit dark regarding lighting.

The Fuji X-A2 looks more fresh. A bit rougher but more COLOURFUL (is that even possible?).

Is this possible? I'm a newbie and don't know much about cameras, but they are absolute opposites. While the GX-7 seems better, I prefer the rougher, colourful look of the pictures taken with a X-A2.

What do you think?
Did you ever pick up the worse camera because it transmitted a look more in line with your style, despite being way inferior at the same price?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Searching for posts that contain ‘panasonic’ and that are only OP posts. 246 results found.

On these archives

Your latest searches