>>4141649>I read novels a lot as a kid but grew to pretty much hate fiction outside of mythology and historical fiction. I mostly enjoy biographies and poetry now. Verse is far superior to prose because it impresses its rhythm on the reader and thus orders the world in a more communicative fashion. Cinema is good at this, depending on the director.You'll hate this but I tend to side with Plath here - I believe that pottery is an evasion of the real job of making prose. I tend to consume fiction, of the pulpy short variety. A bit of a flash fiction junkie. I'm not good at writing flash fiction though, more suited to the longer short story.
>>4141655>it is roughly equivalent to saying that sounds are truth, since the soundwaves are truly real, whether they carry lies or not.>I think it's still kind of stupid but when you're comparing it to books, paintings, dialogues and such, Godard's position is sensical in seeing photography & cinema as more "real" than any of the alternatives.I see your point but I think what he meant was probably less literal, perhaps a commentary about how real it's perceived as.
>>4141791>No, what separates art from entertainment is that art aims to say something that hasn't been said before.This is bullshit.
>That's your fault for watching mere entertainment.This much I can agree with.
>>4141792For Ed Harris-core, The Truman Show.
For Sudeikis-core, We're the Millers.
Literally anything is better than that middlebrow self-indungent jewish insincere joint. Mark Raso is supposedly Mexican-Canadian, I'm guessing he's Marrano because judaic influence drips from his stuff. Copenhagen was utter garbage by the way.
>>4141807Go away.
>>4141818It's not HP5+ that makes that art.
>>4141842They're about as coarse but the contrast part is true, still that's an autistic thing to discuss. Equivalent film stocks, indistinguishable from each other with competent postprocessing.
