>>2586053>>2586052Well done.
>>2586008>dat juxtaposition>>2585673>Alphon plsThis is actually pretty decent.
>>2585400Do this in non-shitty overcast light and light the jumper from the side, have the sun behind the camera. Try to make do with your shadow detail.
>>2585369Use a GND next time. You know better, you have trashed my work on here before yet those highlights are flatter than the Olson Twin's tits on Full House. Or crop them out. Any time you are shooting a forest in overcast light even on le glorious god-tier master race film your highlights are going to get blown out like Paris Hilton's vag. Not a lot you can do about it. Otherwise, it's pretty, the rocks are framed by the trees and it would be much better if you can fix those damn highlights.
>>2585360I'd like to see more of the water here. Again, highlights.
>>2585291>>2585286>>2585217much likey. My OCD is pleased.
>>2585185this is fucking into the god damn trash. you have also slammed my work in the past yet post photo-101 tier shit like this, what is the subject here? congratulations, you know how to long-expose, you want a fucking cookie?
Seriously, drop the light pollution if you can and find a subject, make it move and light it up with a flash or something. Do this shot but have someone with a speedlite hit themselves with it in the field. Be creative, Ansel Adams would shit rebar concrete blocks if he had access to the technology we have and it is wasted on snapshittery like this. You have done better work in the past, we all have our low points. You will improve.
>>2585171i like it. try to fill in the surrounding trees with light just a little more, not so much it looks like daylight or horribly-underexposed daylight. I like it though.
>>2582534stanleykubirick/10
Needs a subject though. And less negative space.
