>>2594047This is a really great shot. I'd clean up those white specs, though.
>>2594348Another great shot, but I'm wondering why you shot at 1/2000. You could cut that in half and gain a ton of leeway for ISO.
>>2594354I dig your stuff, but (a) there's no need to post 3.9MB shots, and (b) this is just flat out missed focus.
>>2594661Best shot in the thread, IMO.
>>2595455I actually like this. It's not your typical bird shot.
>>2595457Didn't you post this like a year or two ago?
>>2596471This is really rad. Feels a slightly bit crooked, but I dig the overall feel.
>>2593827Clean your sensor.
>>2592679>>2593825>>2593826>>2595578>>2595667Fucked up white balance. If you're shooting nature and wildlife, get the color right.
>>2596401>>2596405>>2596406>>2596407>>2596408>>2596409These are fine overall, Matty, but your editing is inconsistent between the shots. Some have soft, natural greens. Some have radioactive, kentastic greens, and some have bright yellow greens. I know the light wasn't exactly the same in all of them, but try to normalize the colors a bit.
