>>2598791>How about since you're so positive that it's impossible to damage a lens with a shirt and sand, you put some sand on a lens and rub it for 15 minutes (recorded and uploaded, of course)?I'm moving goalposts, you fucking mongoloid shitstain waste of an academic who will most likely get shat out the front door when it comes time for a thesis?
I said you're not going to scratch your lens, I did not say it's not possible. I can also confidently say that you're never going to eat your own rectum, but it's technically totally possible to cut your rectum out and shove it down your throat before you bleed out.
>Your mo is cute. When you're factually correct, you'll throw a ton of references. When you're wrong, you resort to insults and attempting to move goal posts among other sophist techniques. What I can tell about you is that you have a deep and budding resentment for me gained from multiple spurious attempts at proving me totally wrong with your totally academic and well edjumacated faggotry. You don't know what you're talking about, or how important the concept of degree and scale are to non-autistic conversation. Industrial diamonds *are not in the dust on your motherfucking lens.*
I amped up the swearing, since you seem to equate that and verbosity together as anger.
>Sure they do. Dude above says he's done it to his lenses for over 10 years, that's easily 15 minutes of rubbing time.No it's not. Polishing also implies the buildup of medium between the polished material and the polishing material. If you grind down on a lens for 15 minutes, that particulate glass is going to be under your polishing material.
It's not rocket science. It's applied science. That's why you don't get it. You've never polished anything before. Anyone that's polished a fuckin' dish knows you're an idiot, not an academic.
