>>2603319>How do you like the square format? Are there any major disadvantages, or things I should be aware of about the system? Are there any standout lenses? Or any total junk ones? Is it reasonably manageable to carry around?I like it very much. It takes a different approach to composition if you don't mean to crop down to a standard aspect ratio. I haven't found any disadvantages to be aware of, other than the lack of automation, but if you want that, the square format modular systems aren't for you, and you should be looking for a 645.
The lenses are all optically pretty great. The S lenses are older than the PS lenses, and are usually only single coated, so if you're worried about flaring and such, you'll want to stick to the newer series. There are a few options as far as portrait lenses go, but I prefer the 110mm macro because of the minimum focus distance. The 80mm is great, and small. I also enjoy the 50mm and the 35mm.
I use the speed grip on mine, so it's much more ergonomically pleasing than trying to hold the cube without it. i also prefer the 45 degree viewfinder, but the waist level is very nice, and the regular viewfinder is pretty great too. there are thankfully a lot of options there, including metered finders.
It's been said that the most common failing of the SQ system is the light seals on the film backs, but I haven't had an issue with any of the three that I use.
If you're planning on shooting, and using it, then holding it and carrying it around isn't an issue. Especially if you get a very nice wide strap for it (I use the Slide, by Peak Design and it's very comfy).
