I'll be honest here: these pictures aren't much good.
>>2603165This is the only one I'd even consider saving, because it's got a cool camera isolated from the background by DoF. But that is strictly for gearfaggotry's sake.
>>2603172I get what you're trying to do here, but: there's too much foliage in the upper half of the picture, too little of that sweet sweet cyan-shaded water, and the rock is cut off on both sides -- I'm assuming it's got a little nose on the right which the water flows around, and that should've been in the dang frame. Nice details though. Shame about the wheelchair person who's only significance appears to be cluttering the frame.
>>2603178Nice wall! Shame there's nothing on it!
>>2603183A totally uninteresting sunset. At least mount a wide angle lens and point the camera so that the lower cloud bank's upper edge is like 5% off the top of the frame & make the water somewhat more interesting somehow.
>>2603185Too much ceiling. Looks like it was taken at eye level. The table lip intrudes on the forms behind it. The floor on the lower right is just a waste of space.
>>2603377Could've been good, but the guy isn't composed into the frame properly and there's too much water in there and not enough shore.
>>2604796The trees are cut off, so don't matter. The shrub in front is just a distraction on top of the water. The water is uninteresting; a rudimentary reflection doesn't matter. Spend more time on the tree's barkiness and the plants running along its trunk: that's the interesting bit here.
>>2604809Again: too much overhead foliage, too little water.
Please start shooting 35mm or digital. Get your somewhat-shitty comps out of the way so that you can shoot MF for keeps.