>>2614216Thanks for the compliment sweetie
>>2614219Mmmm browser resizing artifacts
>>2614222Apparently I have an easier time critiquing from inside my own ass than everyone else does from the comfort of a chair. So, no?
>>2614225And I'm not the one that posted the reply, but let's look at this objectively for a second. If that photo was posted at 1000px then people may be tempted to focus on the photo as opposed to the list of rank image quality as seen here
>>2614123Not only that but it also gives op the opportunity for more people to view the photo and give crit in the first place, I'm far from alone in not opening images that don't fit on my screen.
As I mentioned before, the sticky is there for everyone's benefit. Now go collect your toys and put them back in the pram you whiney, clueless manchild.
You mention the sticky is outdated, do the majority of people that have a screen with higher than full HD resolution? You are aware data caps are a thing that exist? Presumably your answers are no and yes, presumably you have the brain power to work out why we suggest a max res and file size. Surely you can't be as self righteously ignorant not to understand and follow what I've said.
